They were good
and we were shit
We lost by just a little bit.
As per usual
I didn't see our bowling
But I saw our batting and the wickets were rolling.
Their fielding was stylish
Their bowling was swish
Hussey and Hopes did alright-ish
But it wasn't enough
We needed something big
... jesus, I just can't rhyme today. I have a hangover, I struggled to watch the match on an awful website that kept coming in and out (particularly when My Lord was batting, so that has put me in a right fowl mood) and we lost.
Nice bowling and fielding, NZ. See you in the first test.
5 thoughts on this post:
I didn't see it but the bowling sounded a bit ordinary. MJ was having radar issues slightly, but came back beautifully at the end.
McKay was expensive.
lou - can't be bothered signing in!
What do you think of McKay? He's done very well so far, but he always seems a trundler to me. With Watto and Hopes there, I am not quite sure what his role is.
He must be clever with the ball.
Lou again.
Haha I do not expect Sid to say a lot about Klint, he is mainly a sound effect to her. But Wes likes Klint muchly, for some obscure reason. Maybe because he is a trundler (haha). Must support him. I think his role is best described as backup bowler who gets thrown in if the selectors feel so. Pity because bloody Apehead stole his show.
The Chappell-Helmet Trophy...
I didn't expect much of 2clint" when he was ruched over to India - he seemed like a stop-gap really. He suprised me, but I feel similar to the way I do Harris - a bit over-rated. But give him time, he hasn't really exploded onto the scene the way Harris did (that always makes me suspicious) so maybe with more matches he'll come good.
OK, that was a quickly typed comment - excuse typos.
Post a Comment