It occurred to me that writing "that last test" might've sounded like I was talking about Melbourne. So I changed it to "the last test" because I mean Sydney.
What I mean is: when we lose it and everybody says (as they did in 2009) "if Hauritz had played ..." I want to be able to say that I said it first.
12 thoughts on this post:
What is your assumption based on?
What assumption?
well, this one:
"if Hauritz had played, we would've won that last test."
I think it's not certain...One might as well say, if Beer or Warne or Santa Claus had played.... we shall never know! :P
Yeah ... it's a joke, Wes. That's kinda what I do, you might have noticed.
Don't take it so seriously.
Well it was worth a thought but one can't tell ;)
It occurred to me that writing "that last test" might've sounded like I was talking about Melbourne. So I changed it to "the last test" because I mean Sydney.
What I mean is: when we lose it and everybody says (as they did in 2009) "if Hauritz had played ..." I want to be able to say that I said it first.
D'oh. The density of my brain is about that of Nibblerpoop (._.)
Santa would be playing for England anyway.
I see him as a stolid number 4 batsmen
C'mon Aussie !!!! (raucously shouted from my flat out into the Oxford night air) !!!!
...and what are you gonna say, if Aus win at the SCG?
I'll deal with that in the unlikely event I need to.
Getting in last:
No you wouldn't have.
Post a Comment